Tag: Ben Duckett

  • Irish tune-up shows how England openers will attack Ashes

    Irish tune-up shows how England openers will attack Ashes

    Debate about England’s Ashes opening pairing should now be over. SIMON WILDE unpacks why Zak Crawley‘s half-century against Ireland is exactly the sort of innings Brendon McCullum would like to see.

    It was easy, of course, to insert the riders, to add the asterisks.

    It is only Ireland, and the Irish are without Josh Little, their liveliest and best fast bowler, who would surely have given the England openers more of a hurry-up. Australia will be tougher for sure. But you can only deal with what is in front of you, and Zak Crawley and Ben Duckett dealt with the early overs of the England innings in some style, if not quite flawlessly.

    Crawley’s 56 from 44 balls was a typical contribution. He exhibited some luscious strokeplay as well as some ugly miscues, which could have brought his downfall on another less fortuitous evening. In the space of two overs he inside-edged three drives to the fine-leg boundary. But while he was at the crease, the bowlers increasingly felt the heat. They might have started with four slips, but finished with fields of Brownian motion.

    Duckett was more efficient and more in control. He lashed balls to both sides of the wicket but was content to bide his time a little more. Duckett’s fifty required 53 balls – still fast by most standards, if not necessarily those of this extraordinarily impatient batting line-up – whereas Crawley, whose morale was no doubt boosted by the sharp catch he held at second slip, got to his in just 39 balls.

    The difference in tempo is probably an indicator of one of several contrasts between two complementary batsmen; Crawley the right-hander who stands 6ft 5in, Duckett the lefty at 5ft 9in. Duckett trusts his defensive game more and might therefore hope to go on to big scores more often, while Crawley perhaps fears that his game will let him down sooner rather than later, so best to get on with things while he can.

    Brendon McCullum, England’s head coach, spoke well of this facet of Crawley’s game in the lead-up to this Test during a Sky Sports podcast in which he compared Crawley’s methods to his own as a Test batsman for New Zealand between 2004 and 2016.

    Asked whether he was asking Crawley to “chase the moments” in the way that he had, McCullum said: “That is exactly what we are asking Zak to do and what Zak wants to do … I see some similarities in us as players, going back to that time when I was trying to conform, [dealing] with fear of failing and trying to become a consistent player. I saw what it did to my game. My offensive game was a lot better than my defence.

    “Zak has a much stronger offensive game and we believe in his ability to put opposition teams under pressure. He’s going to nick out for nought playing a big, extravagant shot, he’s going to miss one trying to whip it through the leg side. But what we look at is the impact you can make on games. I think back to Pakistan, that first innings [in Rawalpindi] when he made 14 off the first over, and a couple of low run chases last summer … little things like that make a significant impact. You’ll [sometimes] have your day out – your double hundred off 180 balls or 100 off 120 that wins the match. That is what we believe. Ultimately you have to have conviction with what you do – total backing of our players.”

    McCullum also said in a press conference earlier in the week that he saw no reason why Crawley would not open against Australia at Edgbaston on June 16, and after this performance – even with the provisos we can insert – that will surely be the case now. Had Crawley fallen cheaply, the England camp would have faced more questions about their errant opener, even if they were still going to stick to their guns.

    A score of 50-odd is not as conclusive a start as it might have been – Crawley looked furious as he trudged off after Fionn Hand took a juggling return catch – but this session of play has made things easier for everyone.

    Most important in England’s eyes, Crawley and Duckett gave the innings the explosive start they wanted, the sort that rocks the opposition back on their heels, and creates greater scoring opportunities for those who follow.

    Focus on averages and the numbers are largely underwhelming. Crawley’s Test average now stands at 28.06, which beyond question is modest. Duckett, who in his first Test on home soil was unbeaten on 60 at stumps, sells his wicket in Tests at 42.37, which is more respectable but not outstanding.

    However, as an opening partnership they are building a record that is unmatched – 593 runs in 11 starts at a rate of 5.85 runs per over. No other first-wicket pair in Test history have scored at faster than five runs an over, though several pairings involving Virender Sehwag came close. Here they brought up England’s 100 in 15.2 overs, the second fastest century start for England in Tests behind a record they set in Rawalpindi.

    As for Duckett, no one who has opened in Tests at least three times, and for whom the data exists, has ever scored faster than his 89.06 runs per 100 balls.

    Seize the initiative and keep it – that is England’s philosophy. And the way their openers batted on this sun-drenched evening illustrated that approach to perfection.

    Originally published as ‘Chase the moments’: How England opener Zak Crawley is embracing Brendon McCullum’s mantra

    Source link

  • Where the Ashes will be won and lost

    Where the Ashes will be won and lost

    With the start of the series a little more than three weeks away, THE TIMES’ cricket writers look at the big selection issues and offer their predictions for an intriguing seven weeks.

    What was your reaction to England’s latest squad – Was it harsh to drop Ben Foakes?

    Mike Atherton: Taking Jonny Bairstow’s fitness on trust (the medics know more than we do), then England made the right call. Once fully fit – wicketkeeping is significantly more challenging than fielding and, therefore, that is my main concern – they had to recall Bairstow and giving him the gloves was the right option. Is it tough on Foakes? Selection is about picking the right team, not the fairest team. Foakes would not let England down, but only one man can do the job. Bairstow’s record as a wicketkeeper in Tests is better than commonly imagined, and Australia will be worried about him at No 7.

    Steve James: Of course it was harsh on Foakes because he has done nothing wrong, but it was entirely expected from my point of view – and the correct decision. Bairstow simply has to play, as long as England are certain that he is fully fit, and his preference has always been to bat at No 7 and have the gloves. He had to be coaxed into the No 5 non-keeping role last year and look how he did under Ben Stokes and Brendon McCullum – so just imagine what he could do under them in his more favoured role.

    Elizabeth Ammon: Bairstow needed to come back in – he’s a game-changer – but dropping Foakes wasn’t the solution I would have chosen. It’s incredibly harsh on Foakes and he seems to be the fall guy for retaining Zak Crawley.

    John Westerby: Selection is supposed to be harsh. If a better option comes along, they get picked. Foakes has done an excellent job, but it’s not as though he was averaging 50 with the bat. The prospect of Bairstow batting with the tail will make England stronger. The pertinent issue is Bairstow’s durability as a wicketkeeper. If England spend long periods in the field, there will be scrutiny on his recently rehabilitated left leg amid a gruelling schedule of five Tests in seven weeks. Foakes may yet have a role to play.

    Elgan Alderman: Harsh and wrong. Foakes’s wicketkeeping skill speaks for itself and with the bat he has made important runs in every series under McCullum and Stokes. He helped Joe Root over the line in the first Test of last summer against New Zealand and made an unbeaten hundred against South Africa. He was the anti- Gilchrist, a late-order oasis after the chaos above. If bare numbers excite you, Foakes has averaged more with the bat in the past 12 months than Zak Crawley, Ollie Pope and Stokes.

    Who should open the batting for England?

    Atherton: Opening is a specialist position, so the talk of promoting Bairstow or Stokes was just that. The only possible alternative among those selected would have been Root, who was trained as an opener all the way through his younger days and has the game for it, but he is entrenched in the middle order now. Having come so far with Crawley, I can’t see the logic in changing now and Australia were more concerned by bowling at him in the previous Ashes than Rory Burns or Haseeb Hameed. It is England’s weakest suit for sure, but Crawley and Ben Duckett for me.

    James: It has made for a good debate because Crawley was the only other player who could have been omitted for Bairstow, but that was never going to happen. I think that, of the present order, only Root is capable of moving up. I did once trumpet Bairstow in the role but, having got to know him better, it is a complete non-starter. Stokes’s backfoot defensive technique – getting too squared up – would be exposed at the top of the order.

    Ammon: Test cricket is far more akin to white-ball cricket, in which Bairstow opens successfully. I would not have sacrificed the best wicketkeeper in the country and would have either tried to persuade Root, Stokes or Bairstow to do it. Pope had never batted at No 3 before last summer and that seems to be working out OK.

    Westerby: We’re into our second decade of pondering this question, without clear answers emerging. Australia’s new-ball attack will provide a stern test for England’s openers and this is not the time to be introducing fresh faces. It’s not sufficient to say Crawley isn’t consistent enough; there has to be a compelling alternative. Alex Lees? Hameed? Keaton Jennings? The backing for Crawley’s ability to influence a game decisively, albeit sporadically, has become symbolic for the “Bazball” approach. The pressure will grow, however, when those around him are not compensating for his inconsistency.

    Alderman: I would never have mooted it 12 months ago, but I would go for Stokes opening the batting, Bairstow in the middle order and Foakes keeping wicket. It is a move in keeping with the “Benball” era: lead the attack from the front, try something different. Crawley has the full support of the team but his heralded upside has been as fleeting as a demon’s whisper thus far.

    With Jofra Archer out for the summer, what would be your bowling attack if the first test were starting tomorrow?

    Atherton: Assuming all are fit and conditions are as expected: James Anderson, Ollie Robinson, Mark Wood, Jack Leach and Stokes. Clearly, with five Tests in seven weeks, there will be an element of rotation during the series.

    James: So much depends on Stokes’s ability to bowl. If he can, then you can play a rather samey but also rather tasty trio of Anderson, Stuart Broad and Robinson. However, Robinson has an ankle problem and England will be mindful of what happened with Anderson in 2019, when he bowled four overs in the first Test and was never seen again. So I might go for Chris Woakes on his home ground of Edgbaston in the first Test instead of Anderson, and if Robinson is unfit then Wood. Could Leach be omitted, and four seamers picked, if Stokes can’t bowl?

    Ammon: Assuming Stokes is fit enough to be a fourth seamer if needed: Broad, Robinson, Woakes and Leach against Ireland; Anderson, Robinson, Wood and Leach for the first Ashes Test.

    Westerby: The best hope for the Ashes is that Stokes can play as a bowler, Robinson is able to play five Tests and Leach survives whatever Australia’s batsmen throw at him. Broad, Anderson, Wood, Woakes and Matthew Potts can then rotate around that axis.

    Alderman: All the talk has been about England’s (now dwindling) stock of fast bowlers, but there’s nothing wrong with having three sub-90mph right-armers for the start of the series: Anderson, Broad and Robinson. Woakes, whose all-round record in England is all-timer good, could fit in for any of them. Have Wood on ice in case the early Tests do not go to plan.

    What have you made of England players such as Stokes and Root being at the IPL but not playing?

    Atherton: It is a reflection on where cricket is at, on player power, and on England’s pragmatic attitude: they are wary of telling the players what to do in case they get an answer they don’t want to hear. I understand the pragmatism, but once the players are contracted for 12 months, I would use that element of control to ensure the best possible preparation. Quite whether the County Championship fits into that, being played in bleak conditions in April and early May, is another argument.

    James: We just have to get used to it these days, even if it seems so frustrating for county followers. It is Root’s first IPL and practice-wise he knows what he is doing, even though he has had little opportunity in the middle, so who can begrudge him the opportunity? Likewise with Stokes. He is at the stage of his career where he deserves all the money he is getting and, knowing how much this Test team means to him, he would never jeopardise that. We just have to trust these two.

    Ammon: It has been helpful to have Stokes warming the bench rather than playing – he’s getting a decent payday for not doing much and saving himself for the Ashes – and Root is adamant that he has learnt more at the IPL than he would have done playing for Yorkshire in Division Two.

    What have you made of Australia’s preparations? Who should England be most worried about?

    Atherton: Steve Smith and Marnus Labuschagne are the engine room of Australia’s batting and much hinges on them. Hopefully Robinson has had a close look at Smith at Hove and found a weakness! If they struggle then Australia will struggle. They have a terrific bowling attack but five Tests (effectively six with the World Test Championship final) in two months is a big ask, so how well Michael Neser and Scott Boland are able to back up Pat Cummins, Mitchell Starc and Josh Hazlewood will be a big factor.

    James: Though I think the all-rounder Cameron Green will be influential, Labuschagne and Smith could decide the series, because it is doubtful whether David Warner can come again, and those two will need to provide the bulk of the runs.

    Westerby: The presence of a genuine all-rounder is one area in which England – through Ian Botham, Andrew Flintoff and Stokes – have often held an advantage. Australia now have Green and how well he adapts to conditions could be a compelling subplot.

    And finally your predictions?

    Atherton: I am slightly less confident than I was at the end of the winter, when England were flying. Injuries to the likes of Archer and a lack of game time and/or form in the IPL for Harry Brook, Root and Stokes has tempered the optimism somewhat. But Australia haven’t won here since 2001 and England are very hard to beat at home. I’m excited by the fact it is so hard to call: a great series is in prospect, with England having a really good chance of winning.

    James: The same as last time here in 2019: 2-2.

    Ammon: England to win 3-1.

    Westerby: 3-2 England. Australia’s pace attack is outstanding, but none of them are spring chickens and if England can blow a hole or two in their attack, as they did with Jason Gillespie in 2005, the cracks could begin to open.

    Alderman: 3-1 England. I’m still not convinced by Australia away from home.

    -The Times

    Originally published as Where the Ashes will be won and lost: Times writers deliver their verdicts on England v Australia

    Source link

  • County bowling won’t help England prep for Ashes

    County bowling won’t help England prep for Ashes

    The lack of quality pace and spin-bowling options in the County Championship is not going to help England as they look to pick a squad for this year’s Ashes series.

    “He will now,” read the message from Nottinghamshire when I asked why Ben Duckett had not been opening for them. This was last winter when Duckett had just made a triumphant return to the Test side, scoring a century against Pakistan in Rawalpindi at the top of the order.

    Last year Duckett asked Nottinghamshire to bat at No.3 and made 1,012 impressive runs at an average of 72.28, but it is refreshing to see that this season, of his own accord – with no diktat from England – he has moved up a spot in line with his international role and is scoring runs freely. So too is Ollie Pope, who is batting at No.3 for Surrey, having been thrust into that spot by England last summer with no previous experience there in first-class cricket.

    These things do matter, even in this modern age of flexibility and adaptability, where so many accepted truths are so easily disproved, and the hegemony of international cricket is being challenged almost by the day through the rise and rise of the franchise game. Whether counties should always be dancing to England’s tune is a wider issue that raises the question of the very purpose of the county game. In my opinion it should be a delicate balance of each county producing players for themselves and for England from their pathways, providing high-class cricket for the community to watch and hopefully being successful in the process.

    However, this also reignites the debate about whether scoring runs in the county game is actually any real sort of preparation for Test cricket, as hinted at by Duckett’s comment after his excellent century against Middlesex at Lord’s last week. “I don’t think I’ll be walking at bowlers as much or paddling Pat Cummins,” the 28-year-old said about the forthcoming Ashes challenge.

    Indeed, it was one of the more striking statistics to emerge from Sir Andrew Strauss’s high-performance review last year that less than 20 per cent of the bowling in county cricket exceeds 84mph, while that figure goes up to above 40 per cent in international cricket. Also, in county cricket, 22 per cent of overs are bowled by spinners – the lowest of any country’s domestic system – while in internationals it is 41 per cent. Little wonder, then, that Strauss lamented county cricket’s lack of encouragement to develop the “extreme skills” of pace and spin that are required in international cricket. This understandably makes life very difficult for selectors when attempting to gauge a player’s readiness for the huge step up to Tests, with Kent’s Ben Compton a salient example.

    Compton’s opening partner at Kent, Zak Crawley, is the England incumbent alongside Duckett, and I am pretty sure that Crawley, with a slightly altered and much improved set-up at the crease, would have been selected for the Ashes even before his blistering 170 off 183 balls against Essex on Saturday.

    However, the late-developing left-handed Compton, 29, had a fine season in 2022 and is continuing that form this year. Is he a Test player? Ask most insiders and they point to a potential weakness against the short ball and Surrey’s Jamie Overton hitting him last year, with his helmet falling on to the stumps (he was not out because of a new ECB regulation). But then how much of the short stuff has he faced? How much practice is needed against it these days?

    Compton is not an obvious “Bazball” player, with a strike rate of only 39.86 last year when making 1,193 County Championship runs at an average of 54.23 – but his strike rate is up this season to 52.09 and so is his average at 71.75. Surely at some stage such a flood of runs must break the dam of selectorial uncertainty? That was always my plan years ago in a situation that I would say was very similar to Compton’s, where I was a late developer too and exceeding most expectations, and it was almost as if people considered all the runs to be just too good to be true.

    Another left-hander, Keaton Jennings, is also a fascinating case. The 30-year-old played 17 Tests between 2016 and 2019, averaging only 25.19, but his outstanding form last season earned him a spot on the winter Test tour to Pakistan, where some thought he would play instead of Duckett, but he did not. The Lancashire opener is in superb touch again this term, as evidenced by his unbeaten 189 before retiring hurt against Somerset last week. Could he come again at international level?

    My colleague Mike Atherton’s description of his style during Lancashire’s opening match against Surrey as “upright, stiff-looking and a touch mechanical” was perfect, detailing exactly why Jennings has had problems at home in Tests – averaging 17 as opposed to 35 abroad, where his excellence on the sweep and reverse-sweep has come to the fore.

    “He will always struggle in England while he does not bend his front knee,” one prominent coach told me some time ago, and while I am still not sure Jennings has his weight quite forward enough (the crucial change Crawley has made) at ball release to do that regularly, he has at least made efforts to alter his method. Previously he would hold his bat aloft but now, inspired by watching a video of the Australian great Matthew Hayden, he waits for the bowler while tapping his bat on the ground. This is manna to me as a coach. If only more players would do this. The modern way is to stand with bat aloft, but too many then drop their hands without taking them back up again, thus only being able to offer a jabbing motion at the ball with a dominant bottom hand.

    With one’s hands starting low they have to be taken back to play any sort of shot, creating a rhythm and flow to batting. The young players I coach are probably tired of my exhortations to “take their hands back” as they move towards the ball (front foot) or away from it (back foot), but I hope they understand its importance. You cannot be a top batsman without doing it, a fact Jennings recognises.

    His innings against Somerset was made at a healthy strike rate of 76.51 and he has undoubtedly taken on board the merits and demands of Bazball, with the ECB’s managing director of men’s cricket, Rob Key, saying even last winter that he had “gone about things in a manner aligned to what Ben [Stokes] and Brendon [McCullum] are after”.

    But if players want a warning about the extremes of Bazball they should look at how Warwickshire’s Chris Benjamin fared last week in a second XI championship match. He made a pair in a 490-run defeat by Somerset, with his second-innings dismissal coming first ball attempting a reverse-scoop. Benjamin was one of the successes of the inaugural Hundred, making a match-winning 24 not out off 15 balls on debut for Birmingham Phoenix. On commentary Kevin Pietersen screamed, “What is that?” to Nasser Hussain in awe when he played that same reverse-scoop to London Spirit’s Blake Cullen for six.

    We can presume that the same question was asked in a rather different sense at Warwickshire’s Portland Road ground last week.

    – The Times

    Originally published as Feasting on lacklustre County bowling won’t help England ahead of crucial Ashes series

    Source link

  • The age-old question Warner needs to answer

    The age-old question Warner needs to answer

    David Warner’s ability to bat himself out of a corner is on show in India. But the question remains, how will he and the rest of the Aussies go in England?

    All those confident assertions that David Warner is finished seem a little less certain after the veteran Australian opener posted his fourth half century in the IPL in the early hours of Friday morning.

    One was to be expected. Two not unusual. Three was three, yeah, but the strike rate wasn’t anything special. Four, however, is something approaching a critical mass. That they come in a sample size of six innings gives further weight to the argument.

    Yes it was in the IPL and no it wasn’t against Stuart Broad, the Dukes ball or on an English pitch, but you have to hand it to Warner. He has a habit of proving people wrong. His 103 Tests are themselves a refutation of the establishment’s confident assertions about the nature of his talent.

    Warner, it was observed at first sighting, was a slugger, a player whose limited skills would limit him to the T20 format. Even NSW wouldn’t give him a first-class game back in the bad old days.

    He forced his way into cricket’s consciousness through the shortest form but pitched his tent for the longest time at the top of the order in the five-day game.

    Players with more classic pedigrees came and went, but the left hander remained and remains.

    All anxieties around Australia’s 17 man squad for this year’s Ashes are based on the assumption that his wick is burning out, the conviction that English conditions confound him.

    Few if any expect him to make it through to the last match at The Oval. Quite a few believe he shouldn’t make the first.

    In the summer Ricky Ponting argued that you never write off a champion, but even his Delhi coach started to wonder if it was time as runs continued to evade the opener.

    “It’s happened to all of us, it happened to me,” he said recently. “When you get to a certain age and it looks like your form is dropping off slightly, then the knives are sharpened and it doesn’t take long,” he said.

    Ponting suggested Warner had missed a trick by not retiring after the 200 in his 100th Test at the MCG in December, but conceded “he’s a driven little man, a pretty stubborn little bugger, so we’ll see how he goes”.

    Ponting and the stubborn little bugger shared an emotional embrace after Warner’s fourth half century in six innings pushed Delhi to its first win of the tournament.

    The one constant in criticism of Warner ahead of these Ashes is the assertion he cannot bat in England. The fact he averaged 9.5 in the last Ashes and has never scored a century in those parts give credence to that assertion, but if Warner 2023 can replicate Warner 2015 then the visitors will be well on their way to pulling off the first Ashes victory in England for two decades.

    In that series, people forget, he scored five half centuries and averaged 46.44. Something approaching that would have the side well on the way to the sort of totals they crave.

    Australia’s top order looks in good shape. While significant contributions are expected from Usman Khawaja, Steve Smith and Marnus Labuschagne if Cameron Green can continue the way he left off it is hard to see Australia losing. Green is critical and coming into his own after 20 Tests. He scored his first century in the last game against India, he is averaging 37.6 with the bat and 34.3 with the ball.

    Fine cricketer and fellow that he is, Mitch Marsh selection in the 17 man Ashes and World Test Championship squad is a tribute to Green and one which George Bailey says followed a Joni Mitchell moment in India. Australia was only knew what it had when it was gone. Or unavailable.

    Green’s absence from the first two Tests of the Border-Gavaskar Trophy, Bailey said, confirmed just how important he is to the set up. Green is, as you may have heard, Australian cricket’s Golden Calf. The almost mythical all-rounder, one who could bowl as well as he batted and one who batted well enough to hold his place in the top six.

    It’s a tough gig. Ask Shane Watson or Marsh who both did their best to hold it down in recent decades. It’s a critical one too: behold the influence of Andrew Flintoff in 2005 and Ben Stokes in times since. The vast majority of the Australian squad is over 30 and the rest are close enough to touch it, but Green at 23 is an exception.

    In The Times this week Michael Atherton wondered whether “with 10 players the wrong side of 30, does the profile of the squad suggest experience or age” but it is the inexperienced who tease ahead of the contest.

    Australia has Green and England has the extraordinary Harry Brook, a young batsman who it appears to embody the ethos of this B-ball game that has England cricket fans in ecstasy. The exited isle hasn’t felt so good about itself since Oasis topped the charts and Tony Blair the polls. For those of you who haven’t been paying attention B-ball is the fast and furious cricket England has discovered since coach Brendon McCullum and championed by all-rounder, captain and occasional slayer-of-Australians Stokes. The traditional foe has found an altogether untraditional approach to the traditional game going hell-for-leather at every opportunity and winning nine out of 10 matches in 2022.

    In that period the team has scored at a run rate of 4.13, a velocity which eclipses the Australians 4.08 in 2003 but one that has been gained, like the Australians in that period, against limited opponents.

    England’s performance in Pakistan shaded the Australians who’d ground out one parched win from 15 days of attritional cricket.

    Pulling up at Rawalpindi in December England posted 4-506 from just 75 overs. Ben Duckett scored his hundred in 105 deliveries, fellow opener Zak Crawley got his in 96, first drop Ollie Pope took 90 and then No. 5 Harry Brook brought his up in 80.

    That last lad, Brook, he’s the one who’ll be vying for attention with Australia’s Green. Only 24, born in Keighley on the confluence of the rivers Worth and Aire, threatens to rewrite the reputation of Yorkshireman. David Warner on bikie speed he made his T20 debut in January 2022 for England and was so impressive they rushed him into the ODI and Test squads. Thoroughly modern, both the young ’uns are warming up for the Ashes with a stint in the IPL. As you do.

    – The Australian

    Peter LalorSenior Sports Writer

    Peter Lalor is The Australian’s chief cricket writer and has been a reporter for over 30 years. An award winning journalist and author he has covered Test cricket in all parts of the world for the newspaper. He has written, among other things, a history of the Sydney Harbour Bridge, a biography of Ron Barassi, a bestselling true crime book and co-authored a biography of Phillip Hughes.

    Source link