<\/p>\n
Further to Thursday\u2019s post, Tom Boonen has apologized for his Colnago comments<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nActually, he didn\u2019t so much apologize as he did repent and genuflect:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nThough he also included this highly ironic photo, so perhaps his \u201capology\u201d is more subversive than it seems at first glance:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nWhen you consider how much dope they were on, attributing any of this result to the bike is like saying Charles III got to where he is today by virtue of his work ethic.<\/p>\nThe result of that race would most likely have been the same if they had no bikes at all and decided to run the course\u2013or ride one-legged, which of course he did a few years later:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nAh, yes, wanton doping and helmetless stunt-riding. Those were the days.<\/p>\nMeanwhile, further to the video I appended to the end of Friday\u2019s post<\/a>, e-whatever batteries keep exploding in New York City, but don\u2019t worry because the Streetsblog pundoscenti have the answer<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nAnd that answer is distance-based charge on food delivery apps, set by the city, that will somehow fix everything;<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nNow, by way of disclosure, I should point out I\u2019ve never used a food delivery app. If I want someone to bring food to my home, I just call the restaurant. Or, if I want to eat food in my home from a restaurant that either doesn\u2019t have delivery people or won\u2019t bring it to me because I\u2019m too far, I go and get it myself. This is not an ideological choice. Mostly I operate this way because it has has worked for me my entire life and I don\u2019t see why I need to incorporate an app into the process\u2013like, how much more convenient does food delivery need to be than calling someone and telling them what I want for dinner? However, I will say that, as a bicyclist, when I see people tearing around the city on all manner of e-whatevers and unregistered gasoline-powered motor scooters, I\u2019m even less inclined to order food that way. This is by no means because I have any issue with people trying to make a living, or because I somehow think that the stoned kid driving for the pizzeria and using a takeout menu as a parking placard contributes more to the \u201clivability\u201d of the city than the guy with the Seamless bag piloting a moped on the sidewalk. However, as an old fuddy-duddy, app delivery just seems like more Internet craziness to me\u2013craziness I can see all around me\u2013and I do feel weird putting my food order out there in the ether so people on scooters can run a bunch of lights and compete with each other to see how fast they can get it to me.<\/p>\nNevertheless, obviously plenty of people want to be able to eat absolutely anything their heart desires in the privacy of their own homes, and most of those people couldn\u2019t care less how it gets to them, so it\u2019s silly to think these apps will ever go away. It\u2019s even sillier to think a $2 fee is going to encourage someone to order for a restaurant that\u2019s slightly closer to them, or that delivery riders will opt for non-electric bikes, especially when, in addition to delivering on them, they also commute on them. (I see them riding into the city from as far away as north Yonkers, because guess what? It\u2019s expensive to live in places where people order in a lot.) But really, we think the City of New York\u2013the same city that can barely build a functional bike lane\u2013can be trusted to pull off something like this?<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nAnd even if they could, should<\/em> they? If the city doesn\u2019t like the way the delivery apps operate\u2013and it shouldn\u2019t\u2013why not make them meet certain requirements and let them pass that cost onto their lazy-ass customers themselves? I couldn\u2019t care less what people have to pay to get their food delivered, but I do care about the city starting yet another racket and getting involved in the food delivery business. A \u201ccity-chartered entity\u201d running \u201csafe-charging depots?\u201d These agencies can\u2019t walk and scratch their balls at the same time, so the last thing we need is to give them an excuse to stop walking altogether and go digging around in their own ass cracks. Maybe if they manage to finish repainting the fucking bike lane in my neighborhood they resurfaced like two years ago I\u2019ll start to think differently. I mean, sure, the city\u2019s public housing is falling apart, its buses barely move, it\u2019s choked with traffic, its bike lane network is completely disjointed, and the city agencies themselves are the biggest perpetrators of the illegal parking<\/a> that so maddens the smuggies<\/a>, but yeah, let\u2019s create a Department of Commercial Bicycle Delivery Charging complete with a well-compensated \u201cDeliverista Czar\u201d to do the apps\u2019 job for them.<\/p>\nLike, you know these apps are exploitative:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nSo why the hell would you advocate for underwriting them?<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nWe\u2019re bailing out their bank<\/a>, for chrissakes, isn\u2019t that enough?<\/p>\nIn a way though I suppose the situation with delivery riders today is not so different from the situation with the pushcarts of yesteryear, which the city addressed by building public markets<\/a>:<\/p>\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\nSome of those markets still operate today, though ironically getting rid of the last of the pushcarts was done at least in part to alleviate traffic congestion, and as such was no doubt quite a boon for the automobile:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nIn any case, I\u2019ve long marveled at how the \u201clivable streets\u201d set always seems to push for the interests of the apps, even when their business interests run inherently counter to their goals of getting more cars off the streets. Hilariously, they couldn\u2019t have been more excited about Uber and Lyft. Like, did anyone actually believe this would happen?<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nI sure didn\u2019t:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nGranted, I was incredibly short-sighted. I mean, everyone knew Ubers would be both self-driving and dirt cheap by 2022:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nBut yeah, in those days, Uber was totally going to reduce car ownership<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nNot only that, but according to \u201cexperts\u201d it was also going to solve the housing crisis and revitalize public transportation:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nAnd we all know this totally happened:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nThat\u2019s why you should always listen to the experts.<\/p>\n\nLike this:<\/h3>\nLike<\/span><\/span> Loading…<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n
Actually, he didn\u2019t so much apologize as he did repent and genuflect:<\/p>\n
Though he also included this highly ironic photo, so perhaps his \u201capology\u201d is more subversive than it seems at first glance:<\/p>\n
When you consider how much dope they were on, attributing any of this result to the bike is like saying Charles III got to where he is today by virtue of his work ethic.<\/p>\n
The result of that race would most likely have been the same if they had no bikes at all and decided to run the course\u2013or ride one-legged, which of course he did a few years later:<\/p>\n
Ah, yes, wanton doping and helmetless stunt-riding. Those were the days.<\/p>\n
Meanwhile, further to the video I appended to the end of Friday\u2019s post<\/a>, e-whatever batteries keep exploding in New York City, but don\u2019t worry because the Streetsblog pundoscenti have the answer<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nAnd that answer is distance-based charge on food delivery apps, set by the city, that will somehow fix everything;<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nNow, by way of disclosure, I should point out I\u2019ve never used a food delivery app. If I want someone to bring food to my home, I just call the restaurant. Or, if I want to eat food in my home from a restaurant that either doesn\u2019t have delivery people or won\u2019t bring it to me because I\u2019m too far, I go and get it myself. This is not an ideological choice. Mostly I operate this way because it has has worked for me my entire life and I don\u2019t see why I need to incorporate an app into the process\u2013like, how much more convenient does food delivery need to be than calling someone and telling them what I want for dinner? However, I will say that, as a bicyclist, when I see people tearing around the city on all manner of e-whatevers and unregistered gasoline-powered motor scooters, I\u2019m even less inclined to order food that way. This is by no means because I have any issue with people trying to make a living, or because I somehow think that the stoned kid driving for the pizzeria and using a takeout menu as a parking placard contributes more to the \u201clivability\u201d of the city than the guy with the Seamless bag piloting a moped on the sidewalk. However, as an old fuddy-duddy, app delivery just seems like more Internet craziness to me\u2013craziness I can see all around me\u2013and I do feel weird putting my food order out there in the ether so people on scooters can run a bunch of lights and compete with each other to see how fast they can get it to me.<\/p>\nNevertheless, obviously plenty of people want to be able to eat absolutely anything their heart desires in the privacy of their own homes, and most of those people couldn\u2019t care less how it gets to them, so it\u2019s silly to think these apps will ever go away. It\u2019s even sillier to think a $2 fee is going to encourage someone to order for a restaurant that\u2019s slightly closer to them, or that delivery riders will opt for non-electric bikes, especially when, in addition to delivering on them, they also commute on them. (I see them riding into the city from as far away as north Yonkers, because guess what? It\u2019s expensive to live in places where people order in a lot.) But really, we think the City of New York\u2013the same city that can barely build a functional bike lane\u2013can be trusted to pull off something like this?<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nAnd even if they could, should<\/em> they? If the city doesn\u2019t like the way the delivery apps operate\u2013and it shouldn\u2019t\u2013why not make them meet certain requirements and let them pass that cost onto their lazy-ass customers themselves? I couldn\u2019t care less what people have to pay to get their food delivered, but I do care about the city starting yet another racket and getting involved in the food delivery business. A \u201ccity-chartered entity\u201d running \u201csafe-charging depots?\u201d These agencies can\u2019t walk and scratch their balls at the same time, so the last thing we need is to give them an excuse to stop walking altogether and go digging around in their own ass cracks. Maybe if they manage to finish repainting the fucking bike lane in my neighborhood they resurfaced like two years ago I\u2019ll start to think differently. I mean, sure, the city\u2019s public housing is falling apart, its buses barely move, it\u2019s choked with traffic, its bike lane network is completely disjointed, and the city agencies themselves are the biggest perpetrators of the illegal parking<\/a> that so maddens the smuggies<\/a>, but yeah, let\u2019s create a Department of Commercial Bicycle Delivery Charging complete with a well-compensated \u201cDeliverista Czar\u201d to do the apps\u2019 job for them.<\/p>\nLike, you know these apps are exploitative:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nSo why the hell would you advocate for underwriting them?<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nWe\u2019re bailing out their bank<\/a>, for chrissakes, isn\u2019t that enough?<\/p>\nIn a way though I suppose the situation with delivery riders today is not so different from the situation with the pushcarts of yesteryear, which the city addressed by building public markets<\/a>:<\/p>\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\nSome of those markets still operate today, though ironically getting rid of the last of the pushcarts was done at least in part to alleviate traffic congestion, and as such was no doubt quite a boon for the automobile:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nIn any case, I\u2019ve long marveled at how the \u201clivable streets\u201d set always seems to push for the interests of the apps, even when their business interests run inherently counter to their goals of getting more cars off the streets. Hilariously, they couldn\u2019t have been more excited about Uber and Lyft. Like, did anyone actually believe this would happen?<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nI sure didn\u2019t:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nGranted, I was incredibly short-sighted. I mean, everyone knew Ubers would be both self-driving and dirt cheap by 2022:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nBut yeah, in those days, Uber was totally going to reduce car ownership<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nNot only that, but according to \u201cexperts\u201d it was also going to solve the housing crisis and revitalize public transportation:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nAnd we all know this totally happened:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nThat\u2019s why you should always listen to the experts.<\/p>\n\nLike this:<\/h3>\nLike<\/span><\/span> Loading…<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n
And that answer is distance-based charge on food delivery apps, set by the city, that will somehow fix everything;<\/p>\n
Now, by way of disclosure, I should point out I\u2019ve never used a food delivery app. If I want someone to bring food to my home, I just call the restaurant. Or, if I want to eat food in my home from a restaurant that either doesn\u2019t have delivery people or won\u2019t bring it to me because I\u2019m too far, I go and get it myself. This is not an ideological choice. Mostly I operate this way because it has has worked for me my entire life and I don\u2019t see why I need to incorporate an app into the process\u2013like, how much more convenient does food delivery need to be than calling someone and telling them what I want for dinner? However, I will say that, as a bicyclist, when I see people tearing around the city on all manner of e-whatevers and unregistered gasoline-powered motor scooters, I\u2019m even less inclined to order food that way. This is by no means because I have any issue with people trying to make a living, or because I somehow think that the stoned kid driving for the pizzeria and using a takeout menu as a parking placard contributes more to the \u201clivability\u201d of the city than the guy with the Seamless bag piloting a moped on the sidewalk. However, as an old fuddy-duddy, app delivery just seems like more Internet craziness to me\u2013craziness I can see all around me\u2013and I do feel weird putting my food order out there in the ether so people on scooters can run a bunch of lights and compete with each other to see how fast they can get it to me.<\/p>\n
Nevertheless, obviously plenty of people want to be able to eat absolutely anything their heart desires in the privacy of their own homes, and most of those people couldn\u2019t care less how it gets to them, so it\u2019s silly to think these apps will ever go away. It\u2019s even sillier to think a $2 fee is going to encourage someone to order for a restaurant that\u2019s slightly closer to them, or that delivery riders will opt for non-electric bikes, especially when, in addition to delivering on them, they also commute on them. (I see them riding into the city from as far away as north Yonkers, because guess what? It\u2019s expensive to live in places where people order in a lot.) But really, we think the City of New York\u2013the same city that can barely build a functional bike lane\u2013can be trusted to pull off something like this?<\/p>\n
And even if they could, should<\/em> they? If the city doesn\u2019t like the way the delivery apps operate\u2013and it shouldn\u2019t\u2013why not make them meet certain requirements and let them pass that cost onto their lazy-ass customers themselves? I couldn\u2019t care less what people have to pay to get their food delivered, but I do care about the city starting yet another racket and getting involved in the food delivery business. A \u201ccity-chartered entity\u201d running \u201csafe-charging depots?\u201d These agencies can\u2019t walk and scratch their balls at the same time, so the last thing we need is to give them an excuse to stop walking altogether and go digging around in their own ass cracks. Maybe if they manage to finish repainting the fucking bike lane in my neighborhood they resurfaced like two years ago I\u2019ll start to think differently. I mean, sure, the city\u2019s public housing is falling apart, its buses barely move, it\u2019s choked with traffic, its bike lane network is completely disjointed, and the city agencies themselves are the biggest perpetrators of the illegal parking<\/a> that so maddens the smuggies<\/a>, but yeah, let\u2019s create a Department of Commercial Bicycle Delivery Charging complete with a well-compensated \u201cDeliverista Czar\u201d to do the apps\u2019 job for them.<\/p>\nLike, you know these apps are exploitative:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nSo why the hell would you advocate for underwriting them?<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nWe\u2019re bailing out their bank<\/a>, for chrissakes, isn\u2019t that enough?<\/p>\nIn a way though I suppose the situation with delivery riders today is not so different from the situation with the pushcarts of yesteryear, which the city addressed by building public markets<\/a>:<\/p>\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\nSome of those markets still operate today, though ironically getting rid of the last of the pushcarts was done at least in part to alleviate traffic congestion, and as such was no doubt quite a boon for the automobile:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nIn any case, I\u2019ve long marveled at how the \u201clivable streets\u201d set always seems to push for the interests of the apps, even when their business interests run inherently counter to their goals of getting more cars off the streets. Hilariously, they couldn\u2019t have been more excited about Uber and Lyft. Like, did anyone actually believe this would happen?<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nI sure didn\u2019t:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nGranted, I was incredibly short-sighted. I mean, everyone knew Ubers would be both self-driving and dirt cheap by 2022:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nBut yeah, in those days, Uber was totally going to reduce car ownership<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nNot only that, but according to \u201cexperts\u201d it was also going to solve the housing crisis and revitalize public transportation:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nAnd we all know this totally happened:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nThat\u2019s why you should always listen to the experts.<\/p>\n\nLike this:<\/h3>\nLike<\/span><\/span> Loading…<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n
Like, you know these apps are exploitative:<\/p>\n
So why the hell would you advocate for underwriting them?<\/p>\n
We\u2019re bailing out their bank<\/a>, for chrissakes, isn\u2019t that enough?<\/p>\nIn a way though I suppose the situation with delivery riders today is not so different from the situation with the pushcarts of yesteryear, which the city addressed by building public markets<\/a>:<\/p>\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\nSome of those markets still operate today, though ironically getting rid of the last of the pushcarts was done at least in part to alleviate traffic congestion, and as such was no doubt quite a boon for the automobile:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nIn any case, I\u2019ve long marveled at how the \u201clivable streets\u201d set always seems to push for the interests of the apps, even when their business interests run inherently counter to their goals of getting more cars off the streets. Hilariously, they couldn\u2019t have been more excited about Uber and Lyft. Like, did anyone actually believe this would happen?<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nI sure didn\u2019t:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nGranted, I was incredibly short-sighted. I mean, everyone knew Ubers would be both self-driving and dirt cheap by 2022:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nBut yeah, in those days, Uber was totally going to reduce car ownership<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nNot only that, but according to \u201cexperts\u201d it was also going to solve the housing crisis and revitalize public transportation:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nAnd we all know this totally happened:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nThat\u2019s why you should always listen to the experts.<\/p>\n\nLike this:<\/h3>\nLike<\/span><\/span> Loading…<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n
In a way though I suppose the situation with delivery riders today is not so different from the situation with the pushcarts of yesteryear, which the city addressed by building public markets<\/a>:<\/p>\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\nSome of those markets still operate today, though ironically getting rid of the last of the pushcarts was done at least in part to alleviate traffic congestion, and as such was no doubt quite a boon for the automobile:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nIn any case, I\u2019ve long marveled at how the \u201clivable streets\u201d set always seems to push for the interests of the apps, even when their business interests run inherently counter to their goals of getting more cars off the streets. Hilariously, they couldn\u2019t have been more excited about Uber and Lyft. Like, did anyone actually believe this would happen?<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nI sure didn\u2019t:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nGranted, I was incredibly short-sighted. I mean, everyone knew Ubers would be both self-driving and dirt cheap by 2022:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nBut yeah, in those days, Uber was totally going to reduce car ownership<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nNot only that, but according to \u201cexperts\u201d it was also going to solve the housing crisis and revitalize public transportation:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nAnd we all know this totally happened:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nThat\u2019s why you should always listen to the experts.<\/p>\n\nLike this:<\/h3>\nLike<\/span><\/span> Loading…<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n
Some of those markets still operate today, though ironically getting rid of the last of the pushcarts was done at least in part to alleviate traffic congestion, and as such was no doubt quite a boon for the automobile:<\/p>\n
In any case, I\u2019ve long marveled at how the \u201clivable streets\u201d set always seems to push for the interests of the apps, even when their business interests run inherently counter to their goals of getting more cars off the streets. Hilariously, they couldn\u2019t have been more excited about Uber and Lyft. Like, did anyone actually believe this would happen?<\/p>\n
I sure didn\u2019t:<\/p>\n
Granted, I was incredibly short-sighted. I mean, everyone knew Ubers would be both self-driving and dirt cheap by 2022:<\/p>\n
But yeah, in those days, Uber was totally going to reduce car ownership<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nNot only that, but according to \u201cexperts\u201d it was also going to solve the housing crisis and revitalize public transportation:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nAnd we all know this totally happened:<\/p>\n\n<\/noscript><\/figure>\n<\/div>\nThat\u2019s why you should always listen to the experts.<\/p>\n\nLike this:<\/h3>\nLike<\/span><\/span> Loading…<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n
Not only that, but according to \u201cexperts\u201d it was also going to solve the housing crisis and revitalize public transportation:<\/p>\n
And we all know this totally happened:<\/p>\n
That\u2019s why you should always listen to the experts.<\/p>\n
Like<\/span><\/span> Loading…<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bikesnobnyc.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Screenshot-2023-03-13-092308.png?resize=736%2C793&ssl=1\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bikesnobnyc.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Screenshot-2023-03-13-093502.png?resize=736%2C237&ssl=1\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bikesnobnyc.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/FQLTFUk8M4hu6UXxSRUbgf-1200-80.jpg.webp?resize=736%2C491&ssl=1\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bikesnobnyc.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/1200px-Museeuw_Roubaix_2000_1024x1024.webp?resize=736%2C414&ssl=1\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bikesnobnyc.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Screenshot-2023-03-13-085013.png?resize=736%2C677&ssl=1\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bikesnobnyc.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Screenshot-2023-03-13-100357.png?resize=736%2C525&ssl=1\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bikesnobnyc.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Screenshot-2023-03-13-103408.png?resize=736%2C178&ssl=1\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bikesnobnyc.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Screenshot-2023-03-12-094103.png?resize=736%2C115&ssl=1\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bikesnobnyc.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Screenshot-2023-03-12-093726.png?resize=736%2C155&ssl=1\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bikesnobnyc.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Screenshot-2023-03-13-110651.png?resize=736%2C394&ssl=1\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bikesnobnyc.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Screenshot-2023-03-13-111413.png?resize=578%2C734&ssl=1\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bikesnobnyc.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Screenshot-2023-03-13-090242.png?resize=726%2C222&ssl=1\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bikesnobnyc.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Screenshot-2023-03-13-090520.png?resize=731%2C319&ssl=1\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bikesnobnyc.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Screenshot-2023-03-13-090622.png?resize=723%2C166&ssl=1\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bikesnobnyc.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Screenshot-2023-03-13-085406.png?resize=736%2C729&ssl=1\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bikesnobnyc.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Screenshot-2023-03-13-085201.png?resize=736%2C398&ssl=1\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bikesnobnyc.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Screenshot-2023-03-13-085246.png?resize=736%2C216&ssl=1\")