<\/p>\n
Most soccer grip-sock companies describe their products with familiar phrases: maximum grip, lightweight construction and a locked-in feel. Zero Give is positioning itself differently by publishing comparative testing, repeatable methods and factual measurements that players and parents can examine.<\/p>\n
Rather than asking consumers to accept broad performance claims, the company measured how its PivotCore\u2122 sock compared with TRUsox 3.0, Gain The Edge, Apex, WeFoot, Havo Speed X and Senda Gravity Pro.<\/p>\n
The testing examined three areas:<\/p>\n
The results were produced through internal Zero Give testing, not an independent laboratory. However, the company publishes its methods, numerical findings, video evidence and limitations for public review.<\/p>\n
Across the published comparisons, Zero Give recorded:<\/p>\n
Zero Give produced the highest mean BPN under all three traction conditions. It also tied for the lowest pair weight and recorded the lowest toe and cuff thicknesses among the seven grip socks measured.<\/p>\n
These results do not prove that one sock will make every player faster or perform best in every cleat. They show how the tested samples compared under the specific procedures used.<\/p>\n
BPN stands for British Pendulum Number. It is the result produced by a British Pendulum Tester, an instrument that measures frictional resistance as a slider travels across a surface.<\/p>\n
A higher BPN means the pendulum encountered greater resistance to sliding under the stated test conditions.<\/p>\n
BPN matters because terms such as \u201cmaximum grip,\u201d \u201cnon-slip\u201d and \u201chigh traction\u201d are descriptions rather than numerical measurements. Testing different socks with the same instrument and procedure provides a common basis for comparison.<\/p>\n
BPN is not a direct measurement of speed, agility or match performance. It is also not the same as coefficient of friction. A result of 75 BPN should not be interpreted as a coefficient of friction of 0.75.<\/p>\n
Its value is narrower but useful: BPN provides a numerical way to compare how different sock surfaces resist sliding under the same test setup.<\/p>\n
Seven soccer grip socks and one standard non-grip sock were compared across three contact conditions.<\/p>\n
| Sock system<\/b><\/td>\n | Smooth surface<\/b><\/td>\n | Dry insole<\/b><\/td>\n | Fully wet insole<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n| Zero Give<\/td>\n | 75<\/td>\n | 100<\/td>\n | 70<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | Senda Gravity Pro<\/b><\/td>\n | 42.5<\/td>\n | 65<\/td>\n | 15<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | Gain The Edge<\/b><\/td>\n | 45<\/td>\n | 60<\/td>\n | 30<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | Apex<\/b><\/td>\n | 35<\/td>\n | 60<\/td>\n | 20<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | TRUsox 3.0<\/b><\/td>\n | 25<\/td>\n | 55<\/td>\n | 25<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | WeFoot<\/b><\/td>\n | 25<\/td>\n | 45<\/td>\n | 32<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | Havo Speed X<\/b><\/td>\n | 25.75<\/td>\n | 30<\/td>\n | 25<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | Standard non-grip sock<\/b><\/td>\n | 20<\/td>\n | 35<\/td>\n | 30<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n | Zero Give recorded the highest BPN in every condition.<\/p>\n On the smooth reference surface, its 75 BPN result was 30 points higher than the next-highest result of 45 from Gain The Edge.<\/p>\n Against the dry insole, Zero Give reached 100 BPN. Senda Gravity Pro ranked second at 65 BPN, while Gain The Edge and Apex each recorded 60 BPN.<\/p>\n When the insole was fully wet, Zero Give retained a result of 70 BPN. The next-highest grip-sock result was WeFoot at 32 BPN.<\/p>\n The wet test was more severe than the moisture normally produced by perspiration inside a cleat. It should be interpreted as a comparison under a defined fully wet condition\u2014not as a direct simulation of ordinary match sweat.<\/p>\n What Did the Dry and Wet Results Reveal?<\/h3>\nEvery dedicated grip sock produced a lower BPN on the fully wet insole than on the dry insole. The size of the decrease, however, varied considerably.<\/p>\n
|